| Undue burdens | | Print | |
| Thursday, 04 March 2010 15:26 |
|
The Committee on Sustainable Health Benefits (COSHB) that devised the UM's new benefits plan in 2008 had 13 members (not counting the support staff). One member was a retiree. For the 12 active employees, based on public salary data for 2008, salaries ranged from $297,000 to $66,000. Ten out of the 12 had salaries over $100,000. The COSHB's mean salary of $154,000 is about three times the mean salary for a lecturer on the Ann Arbor campus. It is about five times the mean salary for a lecturer in Dearborn or Flint. In arguing for their plan, the COSHB members claimed that it "reduces the burden of premium contributions increases on the University's lowest-paid employees without imposing an undue burden on higher-paid employees . . . ." (COSHB Final Report, 5.4.1). Indeed, it appears that the COSHB plan avoids any burden at all on highly paid employees. An employee with the COSHB's average annual salary -- insuring self, spouse and children through UM Premier Care -- would face only an increase of 0.8% in health care premiums in 2011. As for reducing the burden on lower-paid employees, the COSHB plan is not as successful. For instance, a full-time lecturer in Ann Arbor with the average salary for lecturers on that campus would pay a premium increase of nearly three times as much (2.3% of annual salary) for the same insurance. The following charts illustrate just how effectively the COSHB's plan protects the University's higher-paid employees, such as most of the COSHB's members themselves. The charts are based on the COSHB's projections for employee premium contributions in 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

